Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Love Over Scottland


Author's Note: This  piece is a response to the novel Love Over Scotland. I decided to work on a possible area of weakness: responding to a timed prompt. I was given a prompt and an hour to respond. I feel as though I did much better than I believed I would. It was not as challenging as I thought it would be, and I actually felt less stressed because I knew that I had to just get my thoughts down and not over think anything. Overall, it was an extremely beneficial experience and strengthened my writing.

Even very early on into the novel Love Over Scotland, the reader is able to define how the various characters interact with one another. Naturally, we receive a first impression of the character usually because of the way they interact with others. We perceive their spot they will hold in the novel and commonly decide within the first few seconds of reading about the character if we like them or not. Our opinions could be altered at a moments notice as the result of a mere word the author decided to place in the character's dialogue, or possibly just a simple description of their body language. In any case, studying the interactions between characters is an act we most often do subconsciously. Even so, when we unravel these thoughts and opinions we have created, we are able to better develop a clear image of how the characters interact which assist us in understanding the theme of the novel as a whole.

"'Writers can make mistakes like anybody else," said Antonia, rather peevishly. "We're human, you know." She looked at Angus, as if expecting a refutation, though none came." At particular moments of dialogue like this, we can see the diversity between characters. In this case, it is obvious that Antonia is the type of person to rebuttal -- to speak her mind completely whether the opportunity presents itself, or whether she forces it too. She enjoys being challenged, however only slightly; a good argument here and there gives her fuel, as long as she is clearly the one in control. Provocative statements are often spilling out of her mouth, and in her mind, she is never wrong. On the other hand, Angus, a polite portrait painter and poet, is quite the contrary.

Angus Lordie is able to see right through everyone he encounters. He can strip someone bare by a simple opportunity to study their outward appearance for just a moment. Angus is able to point out and understand what a person is all about without exchanging even a sliver of dialogue.

They had barely introduced themselves, and yet he was confident as to her social background, her interests, and her availability … a white linen blouse (only those with time on their hands to iron could wear linen) … the navy-blue jacket indicated an attachment to the existing order, or even to an order which no longer existed, while the brooch announced that this was a person who had lived in the country, or at least one who knew what the country was all about ... Antonia would thus be a blue stocking, a woman of intellectual interest and marked views.

With only less than a page of writing, the author is able to successfully represent these characters through their thoughts, their dialogue, and their body language. Almost instantly, the reader concludes Angus' observant, affable, and rather quiet personality, followed by the determination of Antonia's rather bold, fearful, and intellectual persona. This is made even more obvious throughout their interactions with one another. A successful writer can accomplish this goal; a successful writer will hint at the theme through spurts of provocative dialogue between characters which is precisely what is exemplified throughout  Love Over Scotland.


Monday, March 18, 2013

Stream of Consciousness: Shimmer


Author's Note: I wrote this stream to get me into the writing mood, and so I could keep up the consistency and frequency of writing creatively without really thinking to analytically about it. I wanted to create a strong yet simple visual with lots of symbolism. I wanted the symbolism to be rather hidden though, and leave for room for it to be interpreted differently. I feel as though the images represented in this stream represent certain situations or people that are becoming sort of prominent in my life at the moment. 

Wet stones shimmer on the pavement, piled high, mounted on top of each other. Each stone attempts to suppress the others value -- shade their reflection -- but it simply cannot be done. One small, although shimmering, stone is not as beautiful as hundreds, thousands of light-capturing jewels. And when they all try to outweigh the next, their shimmer does not shine as bright; it is like setting your sight upon something utterly ordinary. A mere image of nature. But together, after a light rain perhaps, the reflection is magnificent and cannot be ignored. The smooth grey surfaces possess  a  nearly metallic sheen, stunning in contrast to the dew covered grass. And they remain there, still, in lovely harmony, making each other more beautiful as if it burdens no work at all. The sun looks on from above, admiring its work, gazing at its beauty having been created by itself. The stones, the grass -- the glistening water -- is all aware of the Sun and its work. Not one piece in this show is forgotten, or rather forgotten the other. Because put together, each image is like an instrument, creating an extraordinary piece of music, a symphony, for all to enjoy and to hear. In hopes of emulating this day again, and continuing the music the next day, the Sun, stones, grass, and water quite, leaving the moon to paint the night.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Beyond Conventions


Author's Note: This piece is my response to the short story Teddy. This story was a bit of a process to truly explore and understand. There was tons of symbolism within Teddy, and I was determined to uncover most all of it in order to compose a meaningful response. Once I had gathered all my thoughts and made some detailed pre-writing notes, I realized that my focus was way too broad. After a few attempts at the actual composition of my response, I realized, with some guidance, that I needed to narrow the scope of my response. Once that was completed, it was a bit easier for me to write. However, I did have to remind myself more than once that it takes time to put out a worth while response. I realized that covering one very high-level, in depth topic was clearly worth more than trying to cram lots of different ideas. My goal was to create a response that made the reader really think about and study Teddy's personality, and realize that there is so much we can learn from a mere ten year old character within this short story.

"Nicholson took out his cigarettes again, but without taking his eyes off Teddy. "How does one get out of the finite dimensions?" he asked, and gave a short laugh. "I mean, to begin very basically, a block of wood is a block of wood, for example. It has length, width --"" (189) As perplexing as Nicholson's question may be, to Teddy, the answer is quite simple; one must rid of logic. Too often, we answer with logic, when logic is the first thing that must be forgotten when escaping the finite dimensions. One must think outside of and beyond conventions -- erase labels and forget what we think to be facts. Teddy says life is a gift horse in his opinion, and that it is. We must not take our existence for granted and make use of our time on earth by looking beyond the finite dimensions.

Teddy makes use of his time on earth with every word he speaks, with every thought he thinks, and with every action he performs. Literally, he is constantly sticking his head out of the portal and scanning the sea rather than emerging himself in a contained swimming pool. When he is forced to respond to the simplistic ideals of such overly simplified people, he does it in such a way that perplexes them -- makes them question their thoughts all together.

"It hasn't. That's where you're wrong," Teddy said. "Everybody just thinks things keep stopping off somewhere. They don't …" He … took out an eyesore of a handkerchief -- a gray, wadded entity -- and blew his nose. "The reason things seem to stop off somewhere is because that's the only way most people know how to look at things … But that doesn't mean they do."

How does one get to this point? How does one begin to have the mental capacity to explore the world in such a way that is so rare, if existent at all, in today's society? The complexity of how Teddy's mind works bewilders everyone around him; he is a precise example of thinking outside of our labels. Outwardly, Teddy is a mere ten year old boy. However, inversely, his mind is greater than that of a college professor. The notion that age is a convention in itself is thoroughly recognized within the short story and represented by the character of Teddy.

If we never take time to look at things in a contradistinct way, we will always have a singular, narrow view of the world and its inhabitants. We must stress the importance of being aware -- exercising our minds to the fullest in order to live to the fullest. We must empty our thoughts and notions and then conceive of everything  around us adversely. For if we live so lazily, so simplistic yet horribly complicated at the same time, we will lead utterly mundane lives.

"Colors are only names. I mean if you tell them the grass is green, it makes them start expecting the grass to look a certain way--your way--instead of some other way that may be just as good, and may be much better . . . I don't know. I'd just make them vomit up every bit of the apple their parents and everybody made them take a bite out of."

And maybe Teddy is precisely correct. Maybe it is time for us to vomit up every bit of conventions we obtain, and leave our minds hungry and eager to search for the pieces of life that matter.




Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Chilled


Author's Note: This poem is a piece of poetry that I wrote simply as a response to my dire need, my absolute desire, to produce some sort of writing. I was looking to create something artistic, something that wasn't particularly stressful. I've been faced with a lot of structure lately, and I needed to break away from that. I wasn't concerned about where the piece was to go, and as I continued, I realized that I knew precisely what it was about. I believe this piece is a bit of a reflection of how I feel right now. Because the piece is so new and raw as of now, I know that I will most likely discover another meaning, perhaps something entirely different, after I just give it some time. That is a common thread throughout all of my poetry, and it is an interesting and prominent process to me -- to look back and study your subconscious. 

White lips, pale
Face; Soft skin,
Covered in snow flakes

Eyes like marbles, glossed
Over with ice
Closed now,
Shut, and
Closed now

Feet, slowing sinking,
Entrenched in the beautiful
White snow, still
As white as the skin
Of the girl, sinking

Lashes faced down,
And pointing towards
The ground
Blanketed with delicate drops
Of glacial water,
Like thin blades of grass
Covered in dew --
An early spring morning
Held captive in the winter,
Slowly freezing, slowly
Frosting over

The world, an ice rink
Where she slips and slides …
The girl breaths out a
Cloud of smoke,
Swallowed by the sky

Gone